Hi Henning / Peter,
Thanks a lot for your responses......
I'm really very sorry......about the typo mistake
conf-split is 17....
>conf-split should be prime for optimal performance. What's wrong with
>the default 23?
I thought a large conf-split only makes sense if we have more than 20.000
messages *in the queue* . I guess this does not happen even if I send
huge volume of mails after applying big concurrency patch.
I felt we will decrease the file access time and seek time !!!!
Was I wrong...??? Do I need to have huge conf-split to send high
volumes of mails ????
PL suggest me the optimal parameters that I should use.
Cheers,
rajesh.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Henning Brauer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2001 3:48 PM
Subject: Re: conf-spawn and FD_SET SUCCESS
> On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 03:15:36PM +0530, D Rajesh wrote:
> > conf-split --- 15
>
> Congratulations. Nobody knew that 15 was a prime until today.
>
> --
> * Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de *
> * Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany *
> Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity.
> (Dennis Ritchie)
>
