On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 04:27:21PM +0530, D Rajesh wrote:
[snip]
> >conf-split should be prime for optimal performance. What's wrong with
> >the default 23?
>
> I thought a large conf-split only makes sense if we have more than 20.000
> messages *in the queue* . I guess this does not happen even if I send
> huge volume of mails after applying big concurrency patch.
23 is not 'large', and 23 is never too much.
> Was I wrong...??? Do I need to have huge conf-split to send high
> volumes of mails ????
If you intend to have more than about 25.000 mails in the queue, a
conf-split above 23 might be what you want.
However, are you:
- sending 25.000 mails
or
- sending 1 mail to 25.000 people?
Greetz, Peter
--
Against Free Sex! http://www.dataloss.nl/Megahard_en.html
