On Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 10:42:58AM -0400, Dave Sill wrote: > >as far as I saw, TMDA _requires_ the sender to use a special > >taged recipient address. QSP doesn't require that. Both > >TMDA and QSP are targeted for single users. > > TMDA now requires unknown senders to confirm their messages rather > than resending them to a tagged address. Yes, just read his post. Thanks for the update. > >For a server wide system with at nice web interface, have a look > >at oSpam :-) (mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED], & check the other post on > >the list) > > I tried it, and it seems to work pretty much like TMDA, except for the > confirmation link. Where's the web interface? Also, since I use TMDA, Web interface: http://www.olivier.ch/ospam/ login: for example "[EMAIL PROTECTED]", pass "ospam" > the address added to your whitelist is temporary. Does oSpam do clever > matching like user-something@domain matches user-somethingelse@domain? filters with wildcards are planned (if it's what you are talking about), as well as user defined setup, with rbl-check, mx-record check, keywords check in the subject (like qq-rbl). An user could then all all the mails to come in per default, and ask confirmations only for "supicious" mails. Olivier -- _________________________________________________________________ Olivier Mueller - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - PGPkeyID: 0E84D2EA - Switzerland qmail projects: http://omail.omnis.ch - http://webmail.omnis.ch
