On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 11:52:55AM -0400, Chris Johnson wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 08:43:12AM -0700, Greg White wrote:
> > I, personally, favour the idea that a 5xx permanent failure with a nasty note
> > should get sent, rather than 4xx.
>
> I've made that argument before. That particular message, bursting
> as it is with bare linefeeds, will never, ever be accepted by
> qmail-smtpd. So why send a temporary error message, suggesting to
> the sender that he might have better luck if he submits the exact
> same message later?
It sounds a good idea. They are broken anyway.
As long as they don't bring a lot of money for us, BTW <g>
Thank you for comments guys.
Regards,
P.Y. Adi Prasaja
