Matthias Andree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Fri, 07 Sep 2001, Peter van Dijk wrote: > >> Furthermore, what makes you think QMQP is not faster than SMTP? > >Benchmarks. QMQP vs. SMTP made no difference on a K6-2/300 running >FreeBSD 4.x Over what kind of high-latency connection? >Plus, QSBMF cannot reliably be distinguished from regular non-bounce mail. And DSN can? -Dave
- QMQP may eat your mail and its bounces Matthias Andree
- Re: QMQP may eat your mail and its bounces Peter van Dijk
- QMQP, QSBMF, RFC-1894 and MIME (was: QMQP may eat... Matthias Andree
- Re: QMQP, QSBMF, RFC-1894 and MIME (was: QMQP... Dave Sill
- Re: QMQP, QSBMF, RFC-1894 and MIME (was: QMQP... Henning Brauer
- Re: QMQP, QSBMF, RFC-1894 and MIME (was: ... Matthias Andree
- Reliability? What's that? D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Reliability? What's that? Matthias Andree
- qmail2 (was: Re: Reliability? Wh... Olivier M.
- Re: qmail2 (was: Re: Reliabi... Peter van Dijk
- Re: qmail2 (was: Re: Reliabi... Olivier M.
- Re[2]: qmail2 (was: Re: Reli... Gabriel Ambuehl
- Re: QMQP, QSBMF, RFC-1894 and MIME (was: QMQP... Bruno Wolff III
- Re: QMQP, QSBMF, RFC-1894 and MIME (was: ... Matthias Andree
