On Sun, Sep 09, 2001 at 04:57:02PM +0200, Olivier M. wrote: > On Sat, Sep 08, 2001 at 03:49:56AM -0000, D. J. Bernstein wrote: > > You know, I can save _tons_ of writes by storing mail on a RAM disk! Why > > am I bothering to implement a fast journaling filesystem for qmail 2, > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Oh, that sounds good... So there will really be a "qmail 2" version > before next millenium ? :) It would be nice to see a kind of > timeplan somewhere, for example under http://cr.yp.to/qmail/future.html As djb has said often: "qmail 2 will be there when it's there". Do you want a release date, or guaranteed quality? That's what I thought. Greetz, Peter -- Monopoly http://www.dataloss.nl/monopoly.html
- QMQP may eat your mail and its bounces Matthias Andree
- Re: QMQP may eat your mail and its bounces Peter van Dijk
- QMQP, QSBMF, RFC-1894 and MIME (was: QMQP may eat... Matthias Andree
- Re: QMQP, QSBMF, RFC-1894 and MIME (was: QMQP... Dave Sill
- Re: QMQP, QSBMF, RFC-1894 and MIME (was: QMQP... Henning Brauer
- Re: QMQP, QSBMF, RFC-1894 and MIME (was: ... Matthias Andree
- Reliability? What's that? D. J. Bernstein
- Re: Reliability? What's that? Matthias Andree
- qmail2 (was: Re: Reliability? Wh... Olivier M.
- Re: qmail2 (was: Re: Reliabi... Peter van Dijk
- Re: qmail2 (was: Re: Reliabi... Olivier M.
- Re[2]: qmail2 (was: Re: Reli... Gabriel Ambuehl
- Re: QMQP, QSBMF, RFC-1894 and MIME (was: QMQP... Bruno Wolff III
- Re: QMQP, QSBMF, RFC-1894 and MIME (was: ... Matthias Andree
- Re: QMQP, QSBMF, RFC-1894 and MIME (was: ... Pavel Kankovsky
- Re: QMQP, QSBMF, RFC-1894 and MIME Matthias Andree
- Re: QMQP, QSBMF, RFC-1894 and MIME (... Bruno Wolff III
- Re: QMQP may eat your mail and its bounces Dave Sill
- Re: QMQP may eat your mail and its bounces Matthias Andree
