Re: List does not work with Outlook Express

[Robin S. Socha]

* Cristopher Daniluk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> I personally thing the thought of banning an entire mail client
> explicitly is obscene. 

Indeed something like this would at least eliminate mails like yours:

,----
| :0 Bh
| *  20^1 ^>
| * -10^1 ^[^>]
| /dev/null
`----

because you've got 10 lines of text and 67 lines of junk.

> Punishing users for the mistakes of their vendors reeks of disgust. 

You're welcome to use a non-broken MUA.

> Not that I'm trying to say we should go out of our way to accomodate
> every vendor, but explicitly denying one.. uggh.

You are confused(tm). It's not the vendor that matters but the product. You
are either deliberately spreading FUD to defend Microsoft or you shouldn't
be on a technical mailing list because you haven't understood the technical
requirements for an MUA that is to be used in a technical environment. If
in doubt, please refer to http://learn.to/edit_messages/ and please note
that most of the behaviour demanded there is covered by RFCs.