Charles Cazabon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> > The catch is that I still want to POP them out, just not see them as
> > marked NEW.
>
> I think you're screwed, then. You want your POP3 daemon to
> transparently know (and inform the POP3 client) that another process,
> totally unrelated to POP3, has gone into the Maildir and read some
> files. See the problem?
I see the logic that would explain that what I try to do is indeed
problematic. However, if I understood correctly, I could not get the
result wanted by having two POP client access the mailbox with the first
one leaving the mail on the server. When I would POP with the second
one, I would still see the mails I have already read as new.
Philippe
