the also totalably notable thing is you can use [EMAIL PROTECTED] in
many email clients (eudora just does fucked up shit)
but i belive it works in outlook - anywhere where the input field is
suppose to just be the username
Eric
On Fri, 25 Aug 2000, Emiliano wrote:
> Mark Chesney wrote:
>
> > i just think the administrator should have more control over pop usernames.
> > if your email address was [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the current naming
> > convention, your pop username would be brad%theinternet.com. but if you had
> > control over the naming system you could shorten it to something like 'bfp'
> > or 'bfp1' if 'bfp' is already taken. you tell me which is easier on the
> > user.
>
> It's not like yo uhave to type it for every session. And I think
> bfp923 is a lot less clear then brad%theinternet.com.
>
> > not to mention how many email clients would choke on the previous. why
> > should i have to tell a client, "well, if you're using netscape messenger,
> > use this delimiter, and if your using hotmail use this delimiter, and if
> > your using outlook express version facafooey, use this delimiter."
>
> That's another matter.
>
> Emile
>
>
