Yes, the plan is to run them both on seperate IP addresses on the same server.

I know sendmail can be bound to a specific IP, and qmail the same (via one 
of the control files, ~qmail/locals I believe).
Also looks like tcpserver can be used for both POP3 servers (qpopper & 
vchkpw/pop3d).

Doesn't look like it should be any problem, I asked the question originally 
just to see if anyone else had done it and see if they had any advice to share.

Just using qmail's sendmail wrapper doesn't work ... all of my customers 
need to reconfigure their POP3 clients when I change (since vpopmail will 
require them to use the entire email address as a POP username).  Running 
both at the same time and converting one domain at a time will save my arse 
on customer support time.

Anyways, thanks to all who responded and shared input.


Rob Genovesi
Coastside Net, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


At 04:06 PM 10/23/2001 -0400, you wrote:
>Rob,
>
>  Are you running them on different IPs on the same server?
>
>-Rich
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Brad Dameron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "Rob Genovesi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 15:12
>Subject: RE: Qmail + Sendmail
>
>
> > You are going to run into a problem wit them both trying to use port 25.
>You
> > can install Qmail to emulate the functions of sendmail.
> >
> > ---
> > Brad Dameron Network Account Executive
> > TSCNet Inc.          www.tscnet.com
> > Silverdale, WA. 1-888-8TSCNET
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Rob Genovesi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 10:08 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Qmail + Sendmail
> >
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Is anyone running sendmail & qmail (w/ vpopmail) in parallel (on the same
> > machine)?
> >
> > I'm getting read to do this and it doesn't look like there should be any
> > problems, but if anyone
> > has done it (or tried it) and has any advice to pass on I am all ears.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Rob Genovesi
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to