> Also, if I may interject something here, but I feel the whole purpose > of a 'toaster' is that you end up with a self-contained, turnkey > system. All Operating System ideological arguments aside, I could not > care less what the underlying OS of QmailToaster is, as long as it > ends up installing, and gives me a functional box with effecive > administration tools (and effective upgrade paths). > > I generally had an RHEL 3 based box before I revisited QmailToaster, > and seeing as how Centos was recommended, I just reworked the box > with Centos, and the end results bore out making that leap. > > This, I believe, is the whole point of the QmailToaster installation/ > distribution - to allow setting up a QmailToaster box for even people > with limited abilities (I would include myself in that group). > Hence, whatever Nick has decided on supporting as his 'suggested' OS > platform, is just fine by me. > > Harry
Hi Harry, At this moment, I think CentOS 4.2 is the best QmailToaster implementation. Having said that, I really like Mandriva 2006.0 (lots of connectiva influence) and SuSE 10.0 but the QmailToaster install on both these distros is not as straight forward. Also, I have had very little time to work on either Mandriva or SuSE. Soon I should have more time :) Regards, Nick --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
