On Thu, 2006-01-19 at 06:50 -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-01-19 at 13:12 +0100, Thijs Cadier wrote:
>
> > zlib-1.2.1.2-1.2 is the newest one...
> >
> >
> > On 19-jan-2006, at 13:04, Ole Johansen wrote:
> >
> > > yum upgrade zlib
>
{snip}> That said, there does not seem to be any issue with the new qmail- > toaster zlib package in CentOS ... at least not any issues I have > noticed (I could be wrong though, and zlib effects everything on the > distro, including sshd and httpd). I usually never recommend a --nodeps > install ... what I did on all but a test server was change the SRPM spec > file and recompile it without that require. > > A long term permanent solution might be a %if statement in the clamav- > toaster SPEC that only requires the new version of zlib on distros that > don't backport packages. BTW ... I do not mean this as a criticism to qmailtoaster. I highly recommend toaster, and I use it on CentOS-4.x in the corporation where I manage the network/machines. It is just a suggestion to make things smoother. Another suggestion is to change several files to be: %config(noreplace) Files that I think should be config(noreplace) include /etc/mail/local.cf, /etc/tcprules.d/tcp.smtp, and anything in /var/qmail/control/ Thanks, Johnny Hughes CentOS-4 Lead Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
