Ein Bielaczyc wrote:
P.V.Anthony wrote:
jim dandy wrote:

My question is - what do the experts on this list think of DSPAM? I
have been looking at is as an addition to Spamassassin.
It looks to be getting good reviews, however id like to hear some more
opinions.
I am not an expert and I have not used Spamassassin.

I have been using dspam for about one and half years and it is just
great. I get about one spam a week if any.

For me dspam, especially the latest version, is doing a wonderful job.

P.V.Anthony


Jim, I too would like to use DSPAM, because to me training a filter on
what is spam and what it not seems to be the most effective method.

My problem is that I am using the Qmail Toaster as a gateway between the
internet and my Novell Groupwise system. The Toaster as is, works
wonderfully in this respect, with no ill effects. But configuring DSPAM
in the same way, according to the included docs, is too much
administration. Perhaps P.V. Anthony can add to this, but having to
create 2000+ virtual users to use DSPAM as a gateway just won't fly. If
the Toaster architects can include DSPAM as an option I'd definitely
give it a shot.

I do not know how to use Toaster as gateway. Same for dspam. I am using them like a normal server.

In the latest version, you do not have to create virtual users. You can use just one email account to report spam for all domains. The version I am talking about is dspam 3.6.4. Maybe you want to look at it again.

So far the latest version is very accurate.

I am using dspam with mysql and with group function.

If you want to try, let me know where I can be of help.

You can try just for your email account first before deploying it for the rest.

P.V.Anthony

---------------------------------------------------------------------
    QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to