Erik Espinoza wrote:
Hey Eric,
I'm still baffled as to why I'm getting the standard rejected message on
occasion. Is it definitely coming from simscan, or could it be coming
from tcp.smtp rules?
Without knowing what was rejected, it's hard to tell. There wasn't
enough information in the first message.
Following is an example of a message that bounced. The scenario is thus:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (hosted server) is being forwarded to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (my toaster). I redirected this email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED], it bounced back to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and was
forwarded (successfully) to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can you make anything out of it? Let me know if there's anything else
you'd like to see. I've grep'd and gandered at the logs, and don't see
anything that pops out at me.
Again, thanks so much for your help.
From - Tue May 23 08:50:28 2006
X-Account-Key: account4
X-UIDL: 1148399424.3365.doris.shubes,S=7353
X-Mozilla-Status: 0001
X-Mozilla-Status2: 10000000
Return-Path: <>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 3363 invoked by uid 89); 23 May 2006 15:50:24 -0000
DomainKey-Status: no signature
Received: by simscan 1.2.0 ppid: 3358, pid: 3359, t: 1.2273s
scanners: clamav: 0.88.2/m:38/d:1467 spam: 3.1.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2006-03-10) on doris.shubes
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,MIME_HEADER_CTYPE_ONLY,
MIME_QP_LONG_LINE,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=no version=3.1.1
Received: from unknown (HELO mail3.contraxx.biz) (162.42.218.91)
by doris.shubes with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 23 May 2006
15:50:23 -0000
Received-SPF: none (doris.shubes: domain at mail3.contraxx.biz does not
designate permitted sender hosts)
Received: from mail3.contraxx.biz
by mail3.contraxx.biz (Contraxx Technolgy Group, Inc. Mail
Server ver 8.0.3 on mail3) with SMTP id 5YS64965
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 23 May 2006 08:50:15 -0700
Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 08:50:15 -0700
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]@contraxx.biz>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Returned mail: response error
Content-Type: multipart/report; report-type=delivery-status;
boundary="[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The original message was received at Tue, 23 May 2006 08:50:15 -0700
----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
----- Transcript of session follows -----
... while talking to shubes.homeip.net
>>> DATA
<<< 554 mail server permanently rejected message (#5.3.0)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: message/delivery-status
Reporting-MTA: DNS; mail3.contraxx.biz
Arrival-Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 08:50:14 -0700
Original-Recipient: RFC822; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Final-Recipient: RFC822; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Action: failed
Remote-MTA: DNS; shubes.homeip.net
Last-Attempt-Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 08:50:15 -0700
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from localhost ([162.42.218.91])
by mail3.contraxx.biz (Contraxx Technolgy Group, Inc. Mail
Server ver 8.0.3 on mail3) with SMTP id 5YS64965
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 23 May 2006 08:50:13 -0700
Received: from lists-outbound.sourceforge.net ([66.35.250.225])
by mail3.contraxx.biz (Contraxx Technolgy Group, Inc. Mail
Server ver 8.0.3 on mail3) with ESMTP id 5YS64965
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 11 May 2006 09:35:13 -0700
Received: from sc8-sf-list2-b.sourceforge.net
(sc8-sf-list2-b.sourceforge.net [10.3.1.8])
by sc8-sf-spam2.sourceforge.net (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 9B677139B3; Thu, 11 May 2006 09:35:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.3.1.94] (helo=sc8-sf-list2-new.sourceforge.net)
by sc8-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30)
id 1FeE7h-0000kl-HB
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 11 May 2006 09:34:45 -0700
Received: from sc8-sf-mx2-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.92]
helo=mail.sourceforge.net)
by sc8-sf-list2-new.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
id 1FeE7h-00068r-F8
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 11 May 2006 09:34:45 -0700
Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.184])
by mail.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.44)
id 1FeE7g-0006es-6E
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 11 May 2006 09:34:45 -0700
Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id c31so138287nfb
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 11 May 2006
09:34:37 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
s=beta; d=gmail.com;
h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
b=B6StC8rIxRIFxd2YK4l73Q1c/S0igem89vcpCW/ycv6o8/g78EYlpMqwhVJEgzpkybhnFTIK3ENWDGJCKhxAU0i4tdiwVQ3Odl+/2G6est2y7sjyKCsZUAUop9GbqZcs6uP9e2whakq5tAjp8anbWc60oOiroL7QZyYCYJBi1H4=
Received: by 10.48.213.13 with SMTP id l13mr610197nfg;
Thu, 11 May 2006 09:34:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.48.235.16 with HTTP; Thu, 11 May 2006 09:34:37 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Terry Henderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [IPCop-user] RE: 1:1 NAT Setup[Scanned]
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9-sf.net
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ipcop-user>,
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Id: User mailinglist for the IPCop project.
<ipcop-user.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ipcop-user>,
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Archive:
<http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=ipcop-user>
X-Original-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 11:34:37 -0500
Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 11:34:37 -0500
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.90 required=3.00 tests=USERNAME_IN_SUBJECT
version=3.0
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0 (1.3) on mail3.contraxx.biz
On 5/11/06, Terry Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/11/06, Chris Bradford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I am not sure it is working actually.
> >
> > I tried using the command
> >
> > /sbin/iptables -t nat -A CUSTOMPOSTROUTING -s 172.16.3.6 -o
$RED_DEV> -=
j
> > SNAT --to-source 195.74.108.55
>
> --to not --to-source
>
> Try:
/sbin/iptables -t nat -A CUSTOMPOSTROUTING -s 172.16.3.6 -o $RED_DEV
-j SNAT --to 195.74.108.55
-------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job
easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
IPCop-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ipcop-user
****************************************************
This message has been scanned using Contraxx
Technology Group mail server v8.0.3 and is virus free.
Message sent from Mail Server 3
****************************************************
****************************************************
This message has been scanned using Contraxx
Technology Group mail server v8.0.3 and is virus free.
Message sent from Mail Server 3
****************************************************
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
-Eric 'shubes'
---------------------------------------------------------------------
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
