Jake Vickers wrote:
> Warren (mailing lists) wrote:
>>Does this patch harm mysql 4 at all? If not, should it perhaps be
>>merged into the main source tree?
>>
> It doesn't affect version 4 at all. It just imposes some overhead, which
> is why it hasn't been included as of yet (that, and it's a new issue, so
> there is some lag and testing involved). To the best of my knowledge,
> the overhead has not been benched to see what impact it imposes on
> version 4, and since a very small percentage of users on here are
> running version 5 it has not been a priority.
> Just my 2 cents.
That makes perfect sense, for now. But as the 5.0.x branch of mysql 5
is quite stable, RHEL5 beta 1 is due out any day and Fedora Core 6 is
past its feature and development freeze already, the amount of people
using mysql 5 is going to increase dramatically in the second half of
this year.
I did not see the patch on Erik's site, just an updated rpm, which I
downloaded and will install this evening. What exactly does this patch
do? Is it perhaps something that can be scripted to only install (or
perhaps run) if mysql 5 is installed?
W
---------------------------------------------------------------------
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
