Warren (mailing lists) wrote:
That is an interesting idea. I imagine the overhead impact would not be substantial for the 4.1 branch, so it would probably be included for simplicity, instead of a separate RPM. All things evolve. Toaster will evolve with them, and as soon as 5.0 makes it to the "main stream" it will of course be changed to support this. |
- Re: [qmailtoaster] mysql 5 - what exactly has probl... Warren (mailing lists)
- Re: [qmailtoaster] mysql 5 - what exactly has ... Jake Vickers
- Re: [qmailtoaster] mysql 5 - what exactly has ... Erik Espinoza
- [qmailtoaster] Old qmail to toaster? warren-lists
- Re: [qmailtoaster] Old qmail to toaste... Jake Vickers
