I like EE's explaination. Thanks, EE.

Slamp, care to update the wiki?

Erik Espinoza wrote:
> Slamp, that's not how dnlsbl's work
> 
> DNS Blacklists work by using txt entries.
> 
> For example, this ip address attempted to send me mail, but was banned
> by spamhaus.
> 70.103.74.235
> 
> So you put the order of the octets in reverse and put the dnsbl
> suffix. Then you look for the txt record:
> $ host -t txt 235.74.103.70.sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org
> 235.74.103.70.sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org text
> "http://www.spamhaus.org/SBL/sbl.lasso?query=SBL47341";
> 
> One of Google's mail servers is 66.249.93.114, so I do the same to google:
> $ host -t txt 114.93.249.66.sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org
> Host 114.93.249.66.sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
> 
> The Google one is not listed in spamhaus, so I get an NXDOMAIN.
> 
> "ping" doesn't come to the equation with DNSBL.
> 
> Thanks,
> Erik
> On 10/11/06, slamp slamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> so basicly these are dead hosts because they do not point anywhere. i
>> think these are part of the qmailtoaster-plus, so it might be a good
>> idea to take them out.
>>
>> # dig dnsbl.antispam.or.id
>>
>> ; <<>> DiG 9.2.4 <<>> dnsbl.antispam.or.id
>> ;; global options:  printcmd
>> ;; Got answer:
>> ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 62446
>> ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0
>>
>> ;; QUESTION SECTION:
>> ;dnsbl.antispam.or.id.          IN      A
>>
>> ;; Query time: 1 msec
>> ;; SERVER: 127.0.0.1#53(127.0.0.1)
>> ;; WHEN: Wed Oct 11 16:22:42 2006
>> ;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 38
>>
>>
>> # dig list.dsbl.org
>>
>> ; <<>> DiG 9.2.4 <<>> list.dsbl.org
>> ;; global options:  printcmd
>> ;; Got answer:
>> ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 5171
>> ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0
>>
>> ;; QUESTION SECTION:
>> ;list.dsbl.org.                 IN      A
>>
>> ;; Query time: 1151 msec
>> ;; SERVER: 127.0.0.1#53(127.0.0.1)
>> ;; WHEN: Wed Oct 11 16:22:37 2006
>> ;; MSG SIZE  rcvd: 31
>>
>> On 10/11/06, Eric Shubes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > slamp slamp wrote:
>> > > are the RBL's supposed to be pingable?
>> >
>> > Not necessarily.
>> >
>> > > the others i didn't list here
>> > > because they replied to my ping.
>> > >
>> > > # ping dnsbl.antispam.or.id
>> > > ping: unknown host dnsbl.antispam.or.id
>> > >
>> > > # ping list.dsbl.org
>> > > ping: unknown host list.dsbl.org
>> > >
>> > > wouldn't this slow down toaster if these hosts are not there?
>> > >
>> >
>> > Yes.
>> >
>> > Try
>> > # dig dnsbl.antispam.or.id
>> > # dig list.dsbl.org
>> >
>> > The reply should come from your caching DNS server:
>> > ;; SERVER: 127.0.0.1#53(127.0.0.1)
>> >
>> > --
>> > -Eric 'shubes'
>> >


-- 
-Eric 'shubes'

---------------------------------------------------------------------
     QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to