>I too prefer bind. At least bind serves cname records without including an
A record that confuses Windows and many router DNS servers.
What do you mean? There's a known issue about this with tinydns ?
For example e2000.es is on tinydns and e-web.e2000.es is a C entry on
tinydns data file
Ce-web.e2000.es:usuarios.e2000.es:3600
This is the output from dig:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# dig cname e-web.e2000.es
; <<>> DiG 9.2.4 <<>> cname e-web.e2000.es
;; global options: printcmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 24458
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;e-web.e2000.es. IN CNAME
;; ANSWER SECTION:
e-web.e2000.es. 3600 IN CNAME usuarios.e2000.es.
;; Query time: 1 msec
;; SERVER: 127.0.0.1#53(127.0.0.1)
;; WHEN: Tue Oct 24 09:56:03 2006
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 55
Where is that A record issue? :-S :-S
>Bind works, and these days it even works well.
I indeed do prefer tinydns
BEGIN:VCARD
VERSION:2.1
N:Sánchez Martín;David
FN:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
ORG:E2000 Financial Investments, S.A.;Centro de Nuevas Tecnologías
TITLE:Administrador de Sistemas
TEL;WORK;VOICE:902196177
ADR;WORK;ENCODING=QUOTED-PRINTABLE:;;Agust=EDn Bravo 17 2=BA B=0D=0A33120 PRAVIA;Asturias;;;Espa=F1a
LABEL;WORK;ENCODING=QUOTED-PRINTABLE:Agust=EDn Bravo 17 2=BA B=0D=0A33120 PRAVIA=0D=0AAsturias=0D=0AEspa=F1a
URL;WORK:http://www.e2000.es
EMAIL;PREF;INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
REV:20060705T152542Z
END:VCARD
---------------------------------------------------------------------
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
