Is TinyDNS being used to serve e2000.es?
On 10/24/06, David Sánchez Martín <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I too prefer bind. At least bind serves cname records without including an
A record that confuses Windows and many router DNS servers.
What do you mean? There's a known issue about this with tinydns ?
For example e2000.es is on tinydns and e-web.e2000.es is a C entry on
tinydns data file
Ce-web.e2000.es:usuarios.e2000.es:3600
This is the output from dig:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# dig cname e-web.e2000.es
; <<>> DiG 9.2.4 <<>> cname e-web.e2000.es
;; global options: printcmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 24458
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;e-web.e2000.es. IN CNAME
;; ANSWER SECTION:
e-web.e2000.es. 3600 IN CNAME usuarios.e2000.es.
;; Query time: 1 msec
;; SERVER: 127.0.0.1#53(127.0.0.1)
;; WHEN: Tue Oct 24 09:56:03 2006
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 55
Where is that A record issue? :-S :-S
>Bind works, and these days it even works well.
I indeed do prefer tinydns
---------------------------------------------------------------------
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
