Note, you can use qtp-newmodel (which doesn't require updating for new packages) instead of the install scripts. ;)
Erik Espinoza wrote: > In general, the development and serious testing happens on multiple > distros (centos4, fc6, and soon opensuse) on a machine running OpenVZ > provided by Lightspeed Wireless (they've really helped the development > of this project). > > By the time it's on the devel site, the packages have undergone some > serious testing, so it's fairly safe. Everything on the devel site > right now is considered stable, just that I have not had time to move > things over to the main site, as I'd have to edit all of the install > scripts to include libsrs2-toaster and so forth. > > Best bet, if you're going to build a server today, include the devel > updates. > > Thanks, > Erik > > On 1/10/07, Eric Shubes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> David Milholen wrote: >> > So, should I upgrade my whole package? or just the qmail part? >> >> That depends on how critical the server is. The development packages are >> generally very stable, but there is still a (slightly) higher risk of >> running into a problem with them than with the stable ones. If you're >> upgrading from stable, I would do the whole toaster. >> >> I think that EE's planning on rolling the devel packages over to >> stable w/in >> the next week or so. He might have a better recommendation. >> >> > Maybe it will give me a leg up to install the large server patch. >> > I really think i need it because I have the one customer that has a >> legit >> > business for sending about 6000 msgs at one time. >> >> I'm not familiar with the large server patch. Anyone care to elaborate? >> >> > I am even thinking of setting up another dedicated qmail server for >> > failover purposes. >> >> That's always a good idea for a critical server. You can see >> http://wiki.qmailtoaster.com/index.php/QMT_Failover_replication_Setup for >> one way to do this. I'm presently working on an automated failover setup >> that uses heartbeat. >> >> >> David Milholen wrote: >> >>> I emptied my blacklists file and all is well but may have issues with >> >>> spam >> >>> like I did not before:( >> >>> >> >> You might try the loose blacklist from the (latest, 0.2.3-1.3.5) >> >> qmailtoaster-plus package. It's been working nicely for me for several >> >> weeks >> >> now (thanks to Vince). >> >> >> >> It appears that your send problem is RBL related. The qmail-toaster >> >> package >> >> in development (beginning with version 1.3.8 if I'm not mistaken) >> has a >> >> separate MSA (qmail-smtp) instance running on port 587 (the submission >> >> port) >> >> for sending emails. This should fix your problem permanently. >> >> >> >> -- >> >> -Eric 'shubes' >> >> -- -Eric 'shubes' --------------------------------------------------------------------- QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
