Hi Erik,
It seems that the standard installation of qt installs both squirrelmail and
qmail at the same server. So I assume the whole submission process happens
within the qt server and localhost doesn't need to check against any RBL.
Besides, I suppose users can only send email through squirrelmail after they
have been authenticated (by squirrelmail). What's the benefit of submitting
the mail through the submission port?
Best regards,
Bill
On 2/7/07, Erik Espinoza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Nevermind, the config_local.php changes the setting back.
We haven't changed the SquirrelMail because some people have the
policy of not upgrading all packages, just the ones that need updating
(ClamAV, SpamAssassin, SquirrelMail) but not the djb licensed
packages.
This is because of security. Next SquirrelMail release I'll change the
port to 587 and require qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.8 or higher.
Thanks,
Erik
On 2/6/07, Erik Espinoza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey Slamp,
>
> I was under the impression that Squirrelmail used /usr/sbin/sendmail
> to send mail, not smtp. Doesn't your config.php have "$useSendmail
> = true;"
>
> Erik
>
> The reason squirrelmail uses
> On 2/6/07, slamp slamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Is there a reason why the default config of squirrelmail is not using
the
> > submission port? Is it really necessary for squirrelmail to be checked
> > against RBL's? I found that squirrelmail is much faster (sending) when
> > configured to use the submission port since it bypasses RBL checks.
This
> > also prevents the error "Server replied: 354" when an RBL timeout
occurs.
> >
> > BTW I just updated to the latest and greatest including the 3 devel
packages
> > and everything is perfect (knocks on wood).
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
