> I don't know for sure, but I doubt it.
>
> While it appears to be a flexible framework, the overall effectiveness is
> only as good as the plugins. The plugins I see listed provide capabilities
> that are already in the toaster. Is there something specific you'd like to
> use that the toaster doesn't already provide?
>
> --
I have no particular feature would like to implement .
I'm researching the optimal configuration to make a spam-gateway with
qmail and I would like
to use the toaster as it's base .
I prefer the approach of spp cause is much more modular than write a patch
everytime i need i new a feature and it appears to be not too far from
the modularity of postfix .
Mine would be only a curiosity regarding qmt's support for spp, nothing
more .
Thx for help :)
Have Fun,
Davide
---------------------------------------------------------------------
QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
