I use google for some search. I suppose you talk this about:
http://www.nabble.com/-Bug-5586---New%3A-RDNS_NONE-has-false-positives-if-the-MTA-doesn't-put-the-hostname-in-the-Received-header-tf4221785.html Is perfomance decreasing badly if we enable rdns lookups in tcpserver (tcpserver -h)? 09.08.07, 00:09, Philip Nix Guru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hello > I have very busy smtp servers > using clamav 0.91.1 > When I combined it with spamassassin-toaster-3.1.8-1.3.8 all is working > fine > When I did combine it with spamassassin-toaster-3.2.2-1.3.11 the > scanning time increased badly > and all mails got tagged with RDNS_NONE > The reason is : > There was a change in SA around 3.2.1 whereby it no longer relies on its > own code to do PTR lookups (rDNS) of the MTAs showing in the Received: > headers. Instead it relies on the local MTA to have done it and written > it into the header field. > By default *Qmail* doesn't do rDNS lookups (performance reasons), so you > need to change tcpserver to do them - which then makes SA happy again. > i.e. you want "tcpserver -h" instead of "tcpserver -H" > I have a lot of extra rules and for the performance I reverted back to > spamassassin-toaster-3.1.8-1.3.8 on a few of my smtps > Will do more tests over the weekend > Adam Cantwell wrote: > > L. A. wrote: > >> Is there anybody who try latest clamav 0.91.1 or spamassasin 3.2.2 > >> that live on devel site under heavy load? > >> > >> I have load approx 10000-30000 messages per day at send or receive. > >> And clamav 0 88 and spamd 3.1.8 works great, but for now i saw that > >> clamd cannot use all viruses that freshclam download. So i want build > >> new qt with latest versions of clamav and spamd but i'am not shure, > >> because they stay long time on devel site. > >> > >> So is there somebody who have any problems on hi load servers with them? > >> > > > > First of all, 10,000 - 30,000 messages per day is not even close to > > what I consider "heavy load." I manage a couple of qmailtoaster > > servers, one of which handles >200,000 messages per day and the other > > one more than twice that. Even these I do not consider high load. > > > > I am currently running SA 3.2.1 and ClamAV 0.90.3 and have not had any > > issues at all with said load. > > > > I will be upgrading both of these machines tonight to the latest SA > > and clamav packages on the devel site. I had been waiting for the new > > SA to show up there to do an upgrade. Whenever I build a new QMT box, > > I always include whatever latest packages are on the devel site, and > > for the past two years that I have been using QMT I have not had any > > issues. > > > > Adam > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
