Thanks for that Helmut..
so having a catch all leaves one suseptable to more spam... that is interesting.
   [ i wonder why ]


thanks ALL
and have a great day!

j
----- Original Message ----- From: "Helmut Fritz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 3:18 PM
Subject: RE: [qmailtoaster] 3 simple Qs


I also do not use or want a catchall.  Allows too much spam in...

-----Original Message-----
From: Natalio Gatti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 12:11 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] 3 simple Qs

Jim:

On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 4:28 PM, Jim Shupert, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:


so My q is is there a BEST way to delete ?- is one way better than the
other?

Both ways are equally effective.


also - I do not have quotas on my users - are there any long term
problems with that?

The only problem you can face is more users with big inbox.

and I do not have a catch all account - so should I ?
mm, I don't use it, I discard those mails.

Salutti,
Natalio.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
    QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




---------------------------------------------------------------------
    QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




---------------------------------------------------------------------
    QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to