Just out of curiosity I tried that command as root - and got a bad response.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# su vpopmail -c "spamassassin -t < spammail.eml" This account is currently not available. Any ideas? Jack D. Martin, Jr. ----- Original Message ---- From: Eric Shubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [email protected] Sent: Friday, April 4, 2008 10:55:20 AM Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] spamassassin inconsistent points in mail queue and in console You're not accessing the vpopmail bayes database from the console. Either add the -l parameter to the su command, or add: bayes_path /home/vpopmail/.spamassassin/bayes to your /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf file. I'd recommend the later, so this won't be a problem again (permanent fix). Janno Sannik wrote: > I'm tightening up spam protection and I have a weird mismatch between > points. > > > By running from console: > su vpopmail -c "spamassassin -t < spammail.eml" > > it outputs this: > > Content analysis details: (7.0 points, 5.0 required) > > pts rule name description > ---- ---------------------- > -------------------------------------------------- > 0.0 DK_POLICY_SIGNSOME Domain Keys: policy says domain signs some mails > 2.0 BAYES_80 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 80 to 95% > [score: 0.8157] > 4.0 RCVD_IN_UCEPROTECT1 RBL: Received via a blocked site in > dnsbl-1.uceprotect.net > [82.104.30.169 listed in dnsbl-1.uceprotect.net] > 1.0 RCVD_IN_UCEPROTECT3 RBL: Received via a blocked site in > dnsbl-3.uceprotect.net > [82.104.30.169 listed in dnsbl-3.uceprotect.net] > > But mail in my inbox shows this: > > X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.4 required=5.0 > tests=BAYES_00,DK_POLICY_SIGNSOME, > RCVD_IN_UCEPROTECT1,RCVD_IN_UCEPROTECT3 autolearn=no version=3.1.8 > > > Very interesting is the fact that it sees this email as BAYES_00, and in > console test it recognises it as BAYES_80. Seems like in this case > BAYES_00 probably gives negative value (-2.6 I presume) and that's why > it doesn't get to the required 5.0 value. For info, this spam letter is > very common and is very similar to bunch of others that have been > learned manually before and that also have been identified correctly as > spam in past. What could be the problem? > > This is kinda spamassassin specific, but does anyone know if it's > possible to configure that spamassassin puts scoretable into header, > even thou it didn't exceed required hits (default 5.0). > -- -Eric 'shubes' --------------------------------------------------------------------- QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
