Well, we probably don't need it that bad that then. Thanks John
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 10:37 AM, Eric Shubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't know, short of looking at the code. That would be in the (heavily > patched) source code for the qmail-smtp program. Looking that up would not > be a trivial exercise. > > Tek Support wrote: >> As you said (would have to), how do I determine the order they are >> run? Is it simply that the DKIM header is added on top of the >> simscan, thus simscan first and dkim 2nd? >> >> Thanks >> John >> >> >> >> On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 2:14 PM, Eric Shubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Simscan does scan outbound mail, but scans only for viruses (clamav), not >>> spam (spamassassin). This is consistent with the message you're seeing. >>> >>> Adding the DK signature would (have to) happen after this scan. >>> >>> Tek Support wrote: >>>> Hi Eric, thanks for the quick reply. The reason I think it's doing >>>> outbound scanning is a specific line in the header, maybe you can shed >>>> some light on it. In an email sent from mydomain to my yahoo accout >>>> these are in the headers. The line I'm interrested in, is possibly >>>> added by yahoo, but I think it's from me. >>>> >>>> Received: by simscan 1.3.1 ppid: 4768, pid: 4895, t: 0.0658s >>>> scanners: attach: 1.3.1 clamav: 0.93.3 >>>> >>>> Wouldn't simscan be run on my box, and if so, would it be done before >>>> DKIM or after? >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> John >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 9:42 AM, Eric Shubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>> Tek Support wrote: >>>>>> Hi all, recently I had asked if there was a reason to use the port 587 >>>>>> if I installed spamdyke (because spamdyke authenticated my dynamic >>>>>> users and ignored the rbls). Well, maybe I've found something that >>>>>> would still require me to use 587 instead of port 25. I would >>>>>> appreciate any info. >>>>>> >>>>>> As of right now, my staff are using port 25 for outbound - I just >>>>>> didn't see the need to have another port open to the outside when >>>>>> after installing spamdyke, they were able to send and were not blocked >>>>>> as "dynamic". But the staff have been having trouble sending to >>>>>> yahoo.com, and in looking at the headers on a message that finally >>>>>> arrived into yahoo (and gmail) the headers show this: >>>>>> >>>>>> Authentication-Results: mta553.mail.mud.yahoo.com from=mydomain.com; >>>>>> domainkeys=fail (bad sig) >>>>>> >>>>>> But I had gone through the process step by step and tested my DKIM >>>>>> with the sourceforge.net sites, and those showed that my dkim seemed >>>>>> accurate. So, anyway in a brilliant flash of light I decided to try >>>>>> port 587, and on my first try I got these headers in an email sent to >>>>>> yahoo and gmail: >>>>>> >>>>>> Received-SPF: pass .... >>>>>> DomainKey-Status: good >>>>>> Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass ... >>>>>> >>>>>> So, I guess my question would be, does something in the spam checking >>>>>> on outbound emails from pop3/smtp users (not imap and squirrelmail) >>>>>> with spamdyke, rewrite the headers after the dkim has processed the >>>>>> email which would cause my DKIM hash to be invalid when yahoo and >>>>>> gmail check it? >>>>> I don't believe that spam checking is enabled on outgoing mail, at least >>>>> not >>>>> in the 'stock' toaster. So the answer is, not that I'm aware of. >>>>> >>>>> Note, squirrelmail gets a 'free pass' (open relay), due to the localhost >>>>> line in the /etc/tcprules/tcp.smtp file. >>>>> >>>>> Also, be aware that DK and DKIM are 2 different things. The toaster has a >>>>> (somewhat broken, at least on the incoming side) DK implementation. The >>>>> toaster has no DKIM capability. >>>>> >>>>> I suppose that DK might work (better) with the port 587 configuration than >>>>> with port 25. I wouldn't know why though, as I'm not familiar with the >>>>> problem(s) that DK has. We had a fellow in Russia on the list a while back >>>>> who fixed some things with it, but we haven't heard from him in quite a >>>>> while. >>>>> >>>>>> CentOS 5 >>>>>> x86_64bit >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks >>>>>> John >>>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> -Eric 'shubes' >>>>> >>> >>> -- >>> -Eric 'shubes' >>> > > > -- > -Eric 'shubes' > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
