fbc wrote:
> Any reason why you hope it's not included in the toaster?

No, and that's not what I said. I'll elaborate.

EE has already contributed an awful lot to the toaster, and his time for
doing enhancements is limited. I think he's done far more than his share,
and I'd like to see other competent SAs, particularly those working for
ISPs, make contributions such as this enhancement. This would be most
appropriate for two reasons:
1) ISPs are the types of users who tend to benefit from this enhancement.
2) ISPs typically generate revenue directly from the toaster.

This just seems fair to me.

> It seems like it would only help people out and not be a determent to
> anyone who still uses the default way.
> 
> On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 12:46 AM, Tek Support <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
> 
>     Well now that you've let the cat out of the bag, do tell...   :)
> 
>     Really, I'll wait.
> 
>     Thanks
>     John
> 
> 
>     On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 7:49 PM, Eric Shubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>     > Oops. That was supposed to go to Jake, not the list. Sorry 'bout that.
>     >
>     > Tagcose is a project we're working on. You'll know more of it when
>     the time
>     > comes. Don't hold your breath. ;)
>     >
>     > Tek Support wrote:
>     >> I did a google search for tagcose and couldn't find anything.
>      What is it?
>     >>
>     >> Thanks
>     >> John
>     >>
>     >>
>     >>
>     >> On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 8:34 AM, Eric Shubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>     >>> Just a note, this should be a capability in tagcose,
>     configurable by domain.
>     >>>
>     >>> I sorta hope that EE doesn't get around to including it in the
>     toaster. I'm
>     >>> a little surprised that one of the toaster's ISP users doesn't
>     go ahead and
>     >>> do this themselves. Some probably have. I seem to remember this
>     coming up
>     >>> before on the list.
>     >>>
>     >>> Tek Support wrote:
>     >>>> Ditto, I actually host several domains on one machine (5 dedicated
>     >>>> ips) and I'm getting rejected for lack of RDNS - because my
>     server is
>     >>>> using the 2nd IP for all domains outbound emails.  If this will
>     work
>     >>>> for my scenerio I too would like to see this used in the Toaster.
>     >>>>
>     >>>> Thanks
>     >>>> John
>     >>>>
>     >>>>
>     >>>>
>     >>>>
>     >>>>
>     >>>>
>     >>>> On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 10:58 AM, fbc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>     >>>>> Any chance on getting one of these patches included in qmail
>     toaster, from
>     >>>>> the jms1 page:
>     >>>>> http://qmail.jms1.net/patches/combined-details.shtml
>     >>>>>
>     >>>>> qmail-1.03-bind-interface.patch lets you control the "source
>     IP" from which
>     >>>>> outgoing connections appear from a machine with multiple IP
>     addresses. This
>     >>>>> file on qmail.org <http://qmail.org> (local copy) describes
>     the patch more clearly, as well as
>     >>>>> the format of the /var/qmail/control/bindroutes file which it
>     uses.
>     >>>>>
>     >>>>> I have since updated this patch- see the newbind.patch
>     information below,
>     >>>>> under version 7.05.
>     >>>>>
>     >>>>> I'm having problems sending to some hosts, getting this error
>     message:
>     >>>>> User and password not set, continuing without authentication.
>     >>>>> 2xx.xxx.144.xx does not like recipient.
>     >>>>> Remote host said: 554 Client host rejected: cannot find your
>     hostname,
>     >>>>> [my.1st.ip.addr]
>     >>>>> Giving up on 2xx.xxx.144.xx.
>     >>>>>
>     >>>>> It seems to be because mail.myserver.net
>     <http://mail.myserver.net> resolves to my.2nd.ip.addr (also on
>     >>>>> the same machine) and the default interface is my.1st.ip.addr.
>     >>>>> my.2nd.ip.addr is my mailserver's real IP address, but I can't
>     get it to
>     >>>>> send from anything but my.1st.ip.addr.  This seems like a
>     common problem as
>     >>>>> most dedicated servers you get these days will come with 5 IPs
>     so we run
>     >>>>> different services on each one.
>     >>>>>
>     >>>>> This seems like it would be a useful feature for
>     QmailToaster.. or is there
>     >>>>> already a way to do it?
>     >>>>> Thanks
>     >>>>>
>     >>>
>     >>> --
>     >>> -Eric 'shubes'
>     >>>
>     >
>     >
>     > --
>     > -Eric 'shubes'
>     >


-- 
-Eric 'shubes'

---------------------------------------------------------------------
     QmailToaster hosted by: VR Hosted <http://www.vr.org>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to