Ok. This is probably a stupid question, but... It's Sunday, so I'm entitled
to one stupid question. :-)
I've been using Qmail for many years (10), although only admining one myself
for the past 3. I originally used "Qmailrocks", and am aware of its
shortcomings and issues, compared to "Modern" flavors of qmail.
So... What's the differences between Qmail Toaster, Bill Shupp's Qmail
Toaster, and netqmail? I don't mean the obvious (QMT being an ISO), but
more along the lines of the "Finished Product". What's better/worse about
the three versions?
Also, and this is more for Jake I think, other than being based on CentOS 5,
what's the difference between the "Free" version of your QMT and the QMT5
version? I have no problem paying you for the QMT5 version, but am curious
as to the reason for two versions? Is CentOS5 that much better? (I'm not a
CentOS person, so I'm not sure.)
Anyway, thanks for the time!
Mike
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations.
If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
