Here is the issue I am facing...

 

Hi,

 

I have setup a SA (Spamassissin) server for scanning non-locally hosted
domain. The server is able to accept mails and filter them but unable to
scan them for viruses or arrest the spam. The reason why I say is, when I
check in the Qmail Stats page, SPAMD & CLAMD are showing "ZERO" activity.

 

It will be great if anyone can guide me in checking how to enable SPAMD &
CLAMD checking for the emails being forwarded? Are there any other utilities
which can help check the working of SPAMD & CLAMD.

 

For your information, my SIMCONTROL file output is below where I see both of
them are enabled:

 

:clam=yes,spam=yes,spam_hits=12,attach=.mp3:.src:.bat:.pif

etisbew.com:clam=yes,spam=yes,spam_hits=12,attach=.mp3:.src:.bat:.pif

 

When I checked out the email header of the spam emails received by me, they
appear as below. Here *mail.providio.com* is my main server and
*mail.etisbew.com* is SA server.

 

X-Spam-Flag: YES

X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.4 (2008-01-01) on mail.providio.com

X-Spam-Level: **********

X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_50,HTML_MESSAGE,

 

MIME_HTML_ONLY,RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,RCVD_IN_PBL,RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB,

RCVD_IN_XBL,URIBL_JP_SURBL,URIBL_WS_SURBL autolearn=spam version=3.2.4

 

X-Spam-Report:

 

* 2.0 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in bl.spamcop.net

* [Blocked - see <http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?189.60.108.67>]

           *  0.9 RCVD_IN_PBL RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus PBL

           *      [189.60.108.67 listed in zen.spamhaus.org]

           *  3.0 RCVD_IN_XBL RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus XBL

* 0.6 RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB RBL: SORBS: sender is a abuseable web server

           *      [189.60.108.67 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net]

* 1.5 URIBL_WS_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the WS SURBL blocklist

           *      [URIs: dwusipaf.cn]

* 1.5 URIBL_JP_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the JP SURBL blocklist

           *      [URIs: dwusipaf.cn]

           *  0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message

           *  0.0 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 40 to 60%

           *      [score: 0.5002]

 

* 1.5 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts

Received: (qmail 25096 invoked from network); 18 Sep 2009 08:20:43 -0500

Received: from bd3c6c43.virtua.com.br (HELO ?189.60.108.67?) (189.60.108.67)

 by mail.etisbew.com with SMTP; 18 Sep 2009 08:20:42 -0500

 

 

Received-SPF: pass (mail.etisbew.com: SPF record at etisbew.com designates
189.60.108.67 as permitted sender)

 

From: "Marketta Icjifu" <[email protected]>

To: [email protected]

Mime-Version: 1.0

Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 10:20:49 -0300

Reply-To: "Marketta Fjga" <[email protected]>

Subject: *****SPAM***** Did you follow client?

Message-ID: <2060kq.558468e3.097679275426qdwmetjgpphjrbk...@casa>

Content-type: text/html; charset="utf-8"

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

X-Spam-Prev-Subject: Did you follow client?

 

  _____  

From: Atul Paralikar [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 11:07 AM
To: '[email protected]'
Subject: RE: Mails not being scanned / filtered by SA server

 

Any resolution for this problem?

Reply via email to