How to reset the isologs only for "SPAMD" and "CLAMD"? _____
From: Jake Vickers [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 4:59 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [qmailtoaster] RE: Mails not being scanned / filtered by SA server Atul Paralikar wrote: Here is the issue I am facing... Hi, I have setup a SA (Spamassissin) server for scanning non-locally hosted domain. The server is able to accept mails and filter them but unable to scan them for viruses or arrest the spam. The reason why I say is, when I check in the Qmail Stats page, SPAMD & CLAMD are showing "ZERO" activity. It will be great if anyone can guide me in checking how to enable SPAMD & CLAMD checking for the emails being forwarded? Are there any other utilities which can help check the working of SPAMD & CLAMD. For your information, my SIMCONTROL file output is below where I see both of them are enabled: :clam=yes,spam=yes,spam_hits=12,attach=.mp3:.src:.bat:.pif etisbew.com:clam=yes,spam=yes,spam_hits=12,attach=.mp3:.src:.bat:.pif When I checked out the email header of the spam emails received by me, they appear as below. Here *mail.providio.com* is my main server and *mail.etisbew.com* is SA server. X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.4 (2008-01-01) on mail.providio.com X-Spam-Level: ********** X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_50,HTML_MESSAGE, MIME_HTML_ONLY,RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,RCVD_IN_PBL,RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB, RCVD_IN_XBL,URIBL_JP_SURBL,URIBL_WS_SURBL autolearn=spam version=3.2.4 X-Spam-Report: * 2.0 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in bl.spamcop.net * [Blocked - see <http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?189.60.108.67> <http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?189.60.108.67>] * 0.9 RCVD_IN_PBL RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus PBL * [189.60.108.67 listed in zen.spamhaus.org] * 3.0 RCVD_IN_XBL RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus XBL * 0.6 RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB RBL: SORBS: sender is a abuseable web server * [189.60.108.67 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] * 1.5 URIBL_WS_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the WS SURBL blocklist * [URIs: dwusipaf.cn] * 1.5 URIBL_JP_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the JP SURBL blocklist * [URIs: dwusipaf.cn] * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message * 0.0 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 40 to 60% * [score: 0.5002] * 1.5 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts Received: (qmail 25096 invoked from network); 18 Sep 2009 08:20:43 -0500 Received: from bd3c6c43.virtua.com.br (HELO ?189.60.108.67?) (189.60.108.67) by mail.etisbew.com with SMTP; 18 Sep 2009 08:20:42 -0500 Received-SPF: pass (mail.etisbew.com: SPF record at etisbew.com designates 189.60.108.67 as permitted sender) From: "Marketta Icjifu" <mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 10:20:49 -0300 Reply-To: "Marketta Fjga" <mailto:[email protected]> <[email protected]> Subject: *****SPAM***** Did you follow client? Message-ID: <2060kq.558468e3.097679275426qdwmetjgpphjrbk...@casa> Content-type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Prev-Subject: Did you follow client? I answered your message before. It is working correctly. Your isoqlogs may not be showing anything (they may need a reset), but the underlying system is FINE. The message was run through spamassassin and given a score of 11.0. In this line: etisbew.com:clam=yes,spam=yes,spam_hits=12,attach=.mp3:.src:.bat:.pif You told it to not delete any messages unless they scored above 12.0. Since this message has a score of 11.0, it was not deleted.
