PakOgah wrote:
Does the new clamav efficient with memory usage? this is my memory usage
for clamd. is it normal?
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
4589 clamav 16 0 247m 180m 1320 S 0 9.0 2:04.47 clamd
Looks reasonable to me. Mine's running slightly lower than this, but my
packages are current.
I am using the old clamav (0.95.2) but with newer unofficial-clamav-sigs
v. 3.6 from http://www.inetmsg.com/pub/
because the unofficial-clamav-sigs from the latest qtp is still using
version 2.5
[r...@svr-m1 ~]# rpm -qa | grep plus
qmailtoaster-plus.repo-0.1-1
qmailtoaster-plus-0.3.1-1.4.11
[r...@doris ~]# rpm -qa | grep plus
qmailtoaster-plus.repo-0.2-2
qmailtoaster-plus-0.3.1-1.4.13
You should update these. The current QTP has a replaced qtp-extra-clam
with qtp-install-sanesecurity, which should get you the latest
additional clamav signatures.
I would upgrade as follows:
# yum update
# yum clean all
# qtp-newmodel
# qtp-install-sanesecurity
--
-Eric 'shubes'
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations.
If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
