PakOgah wrote:
Does the new clamav efficient with memory usage? this is my memory usage for clamd. is it normal?

 PID USER      PR  NI  VIRT  RES  SHR S %CPU %MEM    TIME+  COMMAND
4589 clamav    16   0  247m 180m 1320 S    0  9.0   2:04.47 clamd

I am using the old clamav (0.95.2) but with newer unofficial-clamav-sigs v. 3.6 from http://www.inetmsg.com/pub/ because the unofficial-clamav-sigs from the latest qtp is still using version 2.5

[r...@svr-m1 ~]# rpm -qa | grep plus
qmailtoaster-plus.repo-0.1-1
qmailtoaster-plus-0.3.1-1.4.11

If you run additional rulesets for clamav, it will consume more memory. Also the additional rulesets are always being added to, so a gradual increase of the RAM needed for clamav is expected.

8432 clamav    18   0  172m 139m 1260 S  0.0  6.9   2:57.00 clamd

Mine is slightly lower, but this is a low traffic machine (just this list basically!) ;)


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group 
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
   Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations.
     If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
    For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]


Reply via email to