Patrick Ring wrote:
At this point I'm leaning toward leaving Untangle just in charge of my
corporate network (Exchange Server spam and content management) while I
put Spamdyke in charge of the qmailtoaster servers that house mail for
my clients.
I would certainly add spamdyke to QMT as a first step.
I have had very good results for the Untangle Anti-spam (spam counts
went from the thousands per day for just a handful of aacounts to near
zero), but the more research I've done today, coupled with what I've
seen here, I'm thinking that it won't be a good match with QMT.
I don't see any point in fronting QMT (w/ spamdyke) with Untangle.
If any one has more to add (for or against), I'm all ears.
It's not uncommon to use QMT (w/ spamdyke) as an anti-spam front end to
Exchange. That's the direction I would look to move. QMT could handle
the email for your corporate network as well as client emails, and
deliver the corp email (via smtproutes file) on to exchange.
Thank you,
Patrick M. Ring
P. Ring Technologies
Louisiana Web Host, LLC.
985-868-4200
Sure.
--
-Eric 'shubes'
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations.
If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
