Re: [qmailtoaster] Re: Block with no reverse dns

Tue, 22 Mar 2011 12:27:11 -0700


ok.

i have enough simultaneous connections on machines.

use a cluster of five servers in qmailtoaster.

I found that configuring the /etc/tcprules.d/tcp.smtp could help with reverse dns blocking.





Em 22-03-2011 16:18, dhaval thakar escreveu:


On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 12:36 AM, Kalil Costa - Brasilsite <[email protected]> wrote:

i used spamdyke and unfortunately the processes increased, so much processing.

I thought it would be another solution


i guess jgreylist, rblsmtpd should work.


Em 22-03-2011 16:02, Eric Shubert escreveu:

Not that I'm aware of.
Why wouldn't you want to use spamdyke? I wouldn't run any QMT host w/out it. Installation is absolutely trivial.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (www.vickersconsulting.com)
  Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations.
    If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages.
        To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
   For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]





--
Regards
Dhaval Thakar

Education is a fundamental Right. Help educate a child through www.giveindia.org
http://www.linuxreaders.com/
http://www.ipguide.info/



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group (www.vickersconsulting.com) Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations. If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today! --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to