On 03/22/2011 12:06 PM, Kalil Costa - Brasilsite wrote:
i used spamdyke and unfortunately the processes increased, so much
processing.
I thought it would be another solution
Em 22-03-2011 16:02, Eric Shubert escreveu:
Not that I'm aware of.
Why wouldn't you want to use spamdyke? I wouldn't run any QMT host
w/out it. Installation is absolutely trivial.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Which version did you try?
There was a bug in spamdyke 4.1.x which would sometimes keep it from
terminating in a timely fashion. 4.2.0 came out about 6 weeks ago. If
you tried an earlier version, I'd give 4.2.0 a try.
If you tried the 4.2.0 version, I'd really like to help you work out
what the problem is. I've never seen spamdyke increase the load on a
host, but have seen it reduce the load considerably. Your host will do a
lot less scanning (spamassassin and clamav) with spamdyke installed.
--
-Eric 'shubes'
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations.
If you need professional help with your setup, contact them today!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Please visit qmailtoaster.com for the latest news, updates, and packages.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
