Yes using RAID1. And it looks like you are correct. Hard drive error.

Error 1 occurred at disk power-on lifetime: 27 hours (1 days + 3 hours)
  When the command that caused the error occurred, the device was active or
idle.

  After command completion occurred, registers were:
  ER ST SC SN CL CH DH
  -- -- -- -- -- -- --
  10 51 af 00 90 93 e0  Error: IDNF at LBA = 0x00939000 = 9670656



On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Eric Shubert <[email protected]> wrote:

> These are essentially the same versions I have on my host.
>
> This error is intermittent too. For some packages, the problem never
> occurs. The first error you posted is from the sandbox. This last run,
> everything installed ok in the sandbox, and the error didn't occur until
> the upgrade to the live system. It happens to different packages as well.
> Definitely something intermittent. Sometimes it happens, sometimes it
> doesn't. These types of bugs are terribly difficult to track down, but not
> necessarily impossible.
>
> So either the file really *is* bad, or its not bad and the integrity check
> is falsely failing. Because we've observed a package installing
> successfully in the sandbox and failing later, my guess is the later (the
> check is falsely failing). The rpm file is probably good, but the rpm
> program erroneously thinks it's bad. Somehow.
>
> I wonder, is there perhaps a special character unprintable character in
> the filename that we're not seeing? Kinda doubt it, so long as the stock
> settings are used.
>
> I'm beginning to think this may be a hardware problem, like a hard drive
> or memory going bad.
>
> What's the state of your HDD(s)? Do you have raid of any kind? Can you run
> smartctl on the drives? How much free space is there?
>
> --
> -Eric 'shubes'
>
>
> On 10/24/2012 10:22 AM, G V wrote:
>
>> Here you go.
>> rpm -qa | grep rpm | sort
>> redhat-rpm-config-8.0.45-32.**el5.centos
>> rpm-4.4.2.3-28.el5_8
>> rpm-build-4.4.2.3-28.el5_8
>> rpm-devel-4.4.2.3-28.el5_8
>> rpmforge-release-0.5.2-2.el5.**rf
>> rpm-libs-4.4.2.3-28.el5_8
>> rpm-python-4.4.2.3-28.el5_8
>>
>> Eric, thanks for your patience and continued help. This has become a
>> long journey.
>> George
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 9:58 AM, Eric Shubert <[email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>
>>     Dang. They're identical, which they should be. That's good.
>>
>>     So how does rpm manage to install the packages in the sandbox, but
>>     chokes on them (sometimes) when installing them in the base system?
>>
>>     I don't think I've run this stuff on COS 5.8 yet. Has anyone updated
>>     these packages with qtp-newmodel on COS5.8? Please let us know if
>>     you have. I wouldn't expect a problem with that, but who knows?
>>
>>     Let's have a closer look at your rpm packages:
>>     # rpm -qa | grep rpm | sort
>>
>>     --
>>     -Eric 'shubes'
>>
>>
>>     On 10/23/2012 10:33 PM, G V wrote:
>>
>>
>>         On 10/23/2012 9:47 PM, Eric Shubert wrote:
>>
>>             Ok, George. Let's keep digging. There's something weird
>>             going on here.
>>
>>             # cd /usr/src/qtp-upgrade/RPMS
>>             # ls -l *.i686.rpm
>>
>>         -rw-r--r-- 1 root root  307536 Oct 23 22:17
>>         courier-authlib-toaster-0.59._**_2-1.3.10.i686.rpm
>>
>>         -rw-r--r-- 1 root root  853017 Oct 23 22:28
>>         courier-imap-toaster-4.1.2-1._**_3.10.i686.rpm
>>
>>         -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2402408 Oct 23 22:28
>>         qmailadmin-toaster-1.2.16-1.4.**__0.i686.rpm
>>
>>         -rw-r--r-- 1 root root   33686 Oct 23 22:10
>>         qmail-pop3d-toaster-1.03-1.3._**_22.i686.rpm
>>
>>         -rw-r--r-- 1 root root  664187 Oct 23 22:10
>>         qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.22.__**i686.rpm
>>
>>         -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1181851 Oct 23 22:09
>>         vpopmail-toaster-5.4.33-1.4.0.**__i686.rpm
>>
>>             # md5sum *.i686.rpm
>>
>>         ae50283857793c87e937b69d88616e**__e8
>>         courier-authlib-toaster-0.59._**_2-1.3.10.i686.rpm
>>         da9ca074e8eb76206f4bcbf059b432**__9d
>>           courier-imap-toaster-4.1.2-1._**_3.10.i686.rpm
>>         439a9ded3cd44c4dbda4f91a9c0932**__ed
>>           qmailadmin-toaster-1.2.16-1.4.**__0.i686.rpm
>>         16c8295e982013ed8ab37a5ddf1d03**__a8
>>           qmail-pop3d-toaster-1.03-1.3._**_22.i686.rpm
>>         cb261cd2f41fd41658e55c560d5eb8**__43
>>           qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.22.__**i686.rpm
>>         fffeb206bb811ed1c2cab7261b47b4**__8b
>>           vpopmail-toaster-5.4.33-1.4.0.**__i686.rpm
>>
>>
>>
>>             Then, with sandbox still mounted:
>>             # cd /mnt/qtp-sandbox/usr/src/__**redhat/RPMS/i686
>>
>>             # ls -l *.i686.rpm
>>
>>         -rw-r--r-- 1 root root  307536 Oct 23 22:17
>>         courier-authlib-toaster-0.59._**_2-1.3.10.i686.rpm
>>
>>         -rw-r--r-- 1 root root  853017 Oct 23 22:28
>>         courier-imap-toaster-4.1.2-1._**_3.10.i686.rpm
>>
>>         -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2402408 Oct 23 22:28
>>         qmailadmin-toaster-1.2.16-1.4.**__0.i686.rpm
>>
>>         -rw-r--r-- 1 root root   33686 Oct 23 22:10
>>         qmail-pop3d-toaster-1.03-1.3._**_22.i686.rpm
>>
>>         -rw-r--r-- 1 root root  664187 Oct 23 22:10
>>         qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.22.__**i686.rpm
>>
>>         -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1181851 Oct 23 22:09
>>         vpopmail-toaster-5.4.33-1.4.0.**__i686.rpm
>>
>>             # md5sum *.i686.rpm
>>
>>         ae50283857793c87e937b69d88616e**__e8
>>         courier-authlib-toaster-0.59._**_2-1.3.10.i686.rpm
>>         da9ca074e8eb76206f4bcbf059b432**__9d
>>           courier-imap-toaster-4.1.2-1._**_3.10.i686.rpm
>>         439a9ded3cd44c4dbda4f91a9c0932**__ed
>>           qmailadmin-toaster-1.2.16-1.4.**__0.i686.rpm
>>         16c8295e982013ed8ab37a5ddf1d03**__a8
>>           qmail-pop3d-toaster-1.03-1.3._**_22.i686.rpm
>>         cb261cd2f41fd41658e55c560d5eb8**__43
>>           qmail-toaster-1.03-1.3.22.__**i686.rpm
>>         fffeb206bb811ed1c2cab7261b47b4**__8b
>>           vpopmail-toaster-5.4.33-1.4.0.**__i686.rpm
>>
>>
>>
>>             The file sizes and md5sums should be identical. I'm guessing
>>             they're
>>             not. Please post the results and we'll go from there.
>>
>>             FYI, the commands
>>             # qtp-mount-sandbox
>>             # qtp-umount-sandbox
>>             can be run standalone on the cli in case you need one or the
>>             other.
>>
>>
>>
>>         ------------------------------**__----------------------------**
>> --__---------
>>         To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>>         qmailtoaster-list-unsubscribe@**__qmailtoaster.com
>>         
>> <mailto:qmailtoaster-list-**[email protected]<[email protected]>
>> >
>>         For additional commands, e-mail:
>>         qmailtoaster-list-help@__qmail**toaster.com<http://qmailtoaster.com>
>>         
>> <mailto:qmailtoaster-list-**[email protected]<[email protected]>
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>     ------------------------------**__----------------------------**
>> --__---------
>>     To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>>     qmailtoaster-list-unsubscribe@**__qmailtoaster.com
>>     
>> <mailto:qmailtoaster-list-**[email protected]<[email protected]>
>> >
>>     For additional commands, e-mail:
>>     qmailtoaster-list-help@__qmail**toaster.com <http://qmailtoaster.com>
>>     
>> <mailto:qmailtoaster-list-**[email protected]<[email protected]>
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> ------------------------------**------------------------------**---------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
> qmailtoaster-list-unsubscribe@**qmailtoaster.com<[email protected]>
> For additional commands, e-mail: 
> qmailtoaster-list-help@**qmailtoaster.com<[email protected]>
>
>

Reply via email to