Hi all,
Thank you for the ideas. I am trying them out now.
As a slight aside can someone suggest what mail
client I can replace Outlook with as a direct drop
in replacement. The customer has a third party app
they have been told MUST have Outlook to operate
correctly.
TIA.
best wishes
Tony White
On 28/12/2012 07:23, Tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
Il 27/12/2012 21:17, Tonix (Antonio Nati) ha scritto:
Il 27/12/2012 19:40, Eric Shubert ha scritto:
On 12/27/2012 02:58 AM, Tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
Il 24/12/2012 23:49, Eric Shubert ha scritto:
These are all good things to do to QMT, and I hope to have separate
tcprules for smtp and submission ports in the stock QMT at some point.
Tony, from what you've indicated though, I expect it's the intrusion
threshold rule that's biting you. I'm not certain what triggers this
rule, and I could be wrong about this. Hopefully Tonino will clarify
things in this regard.
Please let us know if changing the CHKUSER_RCPTLIMIT variable gets you
going or not.
Hello Eric,
Actually there are basically two variables which provoke this message:
max recipients, and max wrong recipients.
Reaching one of this limits sets the 'intrusion flag on', which display
this message for any other following rcpt.
Regards,
Tonino
It'd be nice if in a future revision each setting/rule had its own unique message, so admins could tell which limit was
triggered. I don't think this is very urgent though.
Actually messages are diversified (i'm quite sure) after the threshold is set.
As the threshold is reached, there should be a specific message. After that, always the same message (generic security
rule message).
I have to check, but I'm sure 99%. Could be external message is always the same (do not want to give any advantage to
intruders), while internally there should be the double phase.
Regards,
Tonino
To be totally honest, I expect that spamdyke will soon have pretty much all of the features of chkuser (I understand
the forthcoming version will be able to check for the existence of user accounts). When spamdyke becomes part of the
stock QMT, chkuser will likely no longer be needed. Chkuser has certainly served its purpose well, none the less.
Thanks Tonino.
You can already check for remote (which in this case means local :-) ) recipients using mailCleaner, which is
indipendent of the mail server and can be installed as indipendent VM (doing also load balancing).
Regards,
Tonino
--
------------------------------------------------------------
Inter@zioni Interazioni di Antonio Nati
http://www.interazioni.it [email protected]
------------------------------------------------------------
--
------------------------------------------------------------
Inter@zioni Interazioni di Antonio Nati
http://www.interazioni.it [email protected]
------------------------------------------------------------
