I don't know of any drop-in replacement for Outlook in such
circumstances. I believe it was Act! that I heard this about as well
several years ago. I wonder if an appropriately named shortcut to
ThunderBird or some such shell script (bat file) might work, but I
expect this might take a bit of programming to work well. BL is that it
probably depends on which third party app is being used.
--
-Eric 'shubes'
On 12/31/2012 01:42 AM, Tony White wrote:
Hi all,
Thank you for the ideas. I am trying them out now.
As a slight aside can someone suggest what mail
client I can replace Outlook with as a direct drop
in replacement. The customer has a third party app
they have been told MUST have Outlook to operate
correctly.
TIA.
best wishes
Tony White
On 28/12/2012 07:23, Tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
Il 27/12/2012 21:17, Tonix (Antonio Nati) ha scritto:
Il 27/12/2012 19:40, Eric Shubert ha scritto:
On 12/27/2012 02:58 AM, Tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote:
Il 24/12/2012 23:49, Eric Shubert ha scritto:
These are all good things to do to QMT, and I hope to have separate
tcprules for smtp and submission ports in the stock QMT at some
point.
Tony, from what you've indicated though, I expect it's the intrusion
threshold rule that's biting you. I'm not certain what triggers this
rule, and I could be wrong about this. Hopefully Tonino will clarify
things in this regard.
Please let us know if changing the CHKUSER_RCPTLIMIT variable gets
you
going or not.
Hello Eric,
Actually there are basically two variables which provoke this message:
max recipients, and max wrong recipients.
Reaching one of this limits sets the 'intrusion flag on', which
display
this message for any other following rcpt.
Regards,
Tonino
It'd be nice if in a future revision each setting/rule had its own
unique message, so admins could tell which limit was triggered. I
don't think this is very urgent though.
Actually messages are diversified (i'm quite sure) after the threshold
is set.
As the threshold is reached, there should be a specific message. After
that, always the same message (generic security rule message).
I have to check, but I'm sure 99%. Could be external message is always
the same (do not want to give any advantage to intruders), while
internally there should be the double phase.
Regards,
Tonino
To be totally honest, I expect that spamdyke will soon have pretty
much all of the features of chkuser (I understand the forthcoming
version will be able to check for the existence of user accounts).
When spamdyke becomes part of the stock QMT, chkuser will likely no
longer be needed. Chkuser has certainly served its purpose well,
none the less.
Thanks Tonino.
You can already check for remote (which in this case means local :-)
) recipients using mailCleaner, which is indipendent of the mail
server and can be installed as indipendent VM (doing also load
balancing).
Regards,
Tonino
--
------------------------------------------------------------
Inter@zioni Interazioni di Antonio Nati
http://www.interazioni.it [email protected]
------------------------------------------------------------
--
------------------------------------------------------------
Inter@zioni Interazioni di Antonio Nati
http://www.interazioni.it [email protected]
------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
