Not that I am using qmailadmin myself but I had used it in the past. Being able to separate mail and web services would totally make sense though. Right now it's not possible at all and with vpopmaild being used at least we had the ability to not run a web host on a core service.
Cheers, Sebastian On 19.02.2013, at 18:53, Eric Shubert <[email protected]> wrote: > I've had a look at the code. There's a section in command.c which should kick > in the catchall functions. This section is conditionally included according > to #ifdef, which should be set according to the .configure options. I checked > the configure output from my build, and every indication is that catchall > processing is enabled. It appears though that the variable isn't being set > for that particular module, so the functions aren't being invoked. The > behavior is the same as if you put an invalid function in the URL. There is > no code in the program to send an "unknown function" message anywhere, it > simply returns a blank screen. Pretty lame. > > The config/make code for qmailadmin is a bit convoluted, but I'll see if I > can find an appropriate fix. It seems to me that it wouldn't hurt to check > for the catchall functions in the command.c module even if/when the > configuration has it disabled (ie remove the #ifdef in the source code), > which should fix things up w/out having to delve into the rest of the > (convoluted) build code. > > I'll try to get that tested in the next couple days to see if I'm right about > this. If it works, I'll release a fixed package, and report the results > upstream. > > On a related note, it was mentioned on the vpopmail list recently that it'd > be nice to have qmailadmin modified to use vpopmaild instead of doing things > directly itself. This would allow qmailadmin to be run on a separate (web) > host from the mail server. I think that's a good idea. Does anyone have any > thoughts on this? > > Thanks. > > -- > -Eric 'shubes' > > On 02/18/2013 11:39 PM, Casey James Price wrote: >> I've experienced the same issue. Any ideas what might be causing this? >> >> /*Casey James Price*/ >> Operations/Technical Support >> >> Smile Global >> www.smileglobal.com <http://www.smileglobal.com> >> <https://twitter.com/#%21/SmileInternet> >> <https://www.facebook.com/smileglobal> >> On 2/15/13 9:37 PM, Cecil Yother, Jr. wrote: >>> On 02/15/2013 05:39 PM, Eric Shubert wrote: >>>> I'm running qmailadmin 1.2.16 (with vpopmail 5.4.33), and when I >>>> click on an account's catchall button or otherwise attempt to change >>>> the catchall status for the domain, it simply returns a blank page >>>> without having changed anything. The url appears to be properly >>>> formatted, and I see what appears to be a normal message in the >>>> apache access log. I'm running the same version on several hosts, and >>>> they all have this problem. >>>> >>>> Anyone else experiencing this? I'm guessing that the latest upgrade >>>> broke something. >>>> >>>> The permissions of the files all look ok. I've looked at the C source >>>> code, and it appears that if there's a problem, it should be showing >>>> a message somewhere. I'm wonder if perhaps it's not getting to that >>>> point in the code. >>>> >>>> Anyone have any input on this? >>>> >>>> Thanks. >>> Eric, >>> >>> I am experiencing the same problem here. On the same machine I am >>> having trouble with vadddomain >>> >>> CJ > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
