On May 28, 2014, at 3:17 AM, Erik Wramner <[email protected]> wrote: > Personally I would prefer to stick with Apache or (ideally) to make the > package work with both depending on which one is available. Nginx is great, > but most shops I work with use Apache and know it well. It works and they > don't want to switch.
+1 to this. For (reasons) I need to run Apache on my mail server. It would be awkward for me if nginx was also on there and contending for ownership of port 80. I guess this is a roundabout way of saying that if we switch to nginx, can the setup be arranged so that nginx can easily/optionally be run on an alternate port where it can coexist rather than conflict with Apache? One other, peripherally related thing: I am following with interest the development of Mailpile (https://www.mailpile.is/) which I think may become a popular option. It's in early alpha currently, so it's perhaps too soon to make any decisions based on what it might or might not do. But I hope that any decisions made about the future of qmailtoaster won't rule out the possibility of a Mailpile install. Angus
