Hi Sebastian, > Hi Alessandro! > > Thank you for your patch. I've slightly modified your idea. I've added > "block" to the separator statements, but I have not extended not_after > because this will otherwise change the idea behind this list (and I'm > not sure if this is the correct place). I think the idea from you behind > this was to omit double semicolon sequences. I've added checks to all > places to omit such a problem. > > Not exactly: the idea behind adding "block" to not_after was to avoid semicolons between adjacent blocks; I didn't expect this would produce double semicolons (just to know, can you provide an example where this should happen?). What is the real idea behind not_after?
Cheers, Alessandro ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ qooxdoo-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel
