To point 1: I don't see why would you need to have back-button or history. The principles of a qooxdoo application are other than we know them from the web1.0 pages. Qooxdoo tries to build a app with windows look&feel, and you don't have back-button or history in windows, do you? To point 6: You don't need XPath to target any elements in the page with qooxdoo though all widgets are objects and your page is class with it's methods and attributes(elements in the page), so you can access them like you know this from OOP. To point 8: Observers are really cool feature. XUL for example has it, and it's really helpful in many situations. But if I remember correctly they are already on the wishlist.
Cheers, alex.d > Hello, > > What do you think of the "8 Ajax evaluation criteria" article > http://www.frontforge.com/#art1002 ? > As i think Qooxdo brings some good capabilities (eventually to be > inproved) to the points 2, 3, 4, 5 and 7 mentionned in this article, i > think points 1, 6 and 8 are more than simple interesting, so good > suggestions to Qooxdo improvements to my mind. What are your opinions on > these subjects, eventual intentions to take them into account ? > > Alex > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ qooxdoo-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel
