On 8/12/07, Jim Hunter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On a side note, when I was working last night I had to comment out a line
> of code because it wouldn't compile with it in. And looking at my code I
> just can't figure out what the line was doing. It was creating a Tree,
> adding TreeFolder and TreeFiles, and the line I removed was
> T_1.setIndex(indx) where T_1 was a TreeFile. I looked all the way back to
> .6.5 and didn't see it in the docs. I was setting it for every TreeFile I
> was creating. Did the old Tree need index values for the TreeFiles? Is that
> what it was doing? Commenting out that line still works (to the best of my
> knowledge). Oh well, just was wondering...
>
I have no idea what that was. I suspect that there was something in the old
Tree implementation that no longer exists now that Tree is a subclass or
TreeFullControl.
Derrell
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
qooxdoo-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel
