Derrell, See my response in the thread. I think I cover all the issues there.
Your checkin will have broken our code - if we were using 0.8 :-) The documentation needs to be improved. Hugh > *Subject:* [qooxdoo-devel] Remote table model -- was anyone using > it? > *From:* "Derrell Lipman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > *To:* "qooxdoo Development" <qooxdoo-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> > *Date:* Sun, 21 Sep 2008 23:02:55 -0400 > > I'm trying to reconcile comments I've seen on this list regarding > people > presumably using Remote Table Model, and my discovery tonight that > it didn't > work. I'd like to understand how it was working for anyone. > Although there > are seemingly editorial changes between the 0.7 version and the 0.8 > version > of Remote.js, there don't appear to be any real substantive diffs, > yet it > was clearly broken in 0.8. > > Hugh, you have previously commented on use of your "implementation" > of > remote table. Were you using a class derived from > qx.ui.table.model.Remote? Has anyone else actually used the Remote > Table > Model with a class derived from qx.ui.table.model.Remote? Has my > fix (see > r16411) broken it for your use? I can't see how that'd be possible > and I > have at least a simple real example of using the corrected version > that > didn't work prior to my patch, but I would like confirmation of > just what's > going on here. > > Any insight would be highly appreciated! > > Thanks, > > Derrell ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ qooxdoo-devel mailing list qooxdoo-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel
