Derrell Lipman schrieb: > I'm trying to reconcile comments I've seen on this list regarding > people presumably using Remote Table Model, and my discovery tonight > that it didn't work. I'd like to understand how it was working for > anyone. Although there are seemingly editorial changes between the > 0.7 version and the 0.8 version of Remote.js, there don't appear to be > any real substantive diffs, yet it was clearly broken in 0.8. > > Hugh, you have previously commented on use of your "implementation" of > remote table. Were you using a class derived from > qx.ui.table.model.Remote? Has anyone else actually used the Remote > Table Model with a class derived from qx.ui.table.model.Remote? Has > my fix (see r16411) broken it for your use? I can't see how that'd be > possible and I have at least a simple real example of using the > corrected version that didn't work prior to my patch, but I would like > confirmation of just what's going on here. > > Any insight would be highly appreciated! > > Thanks, > > Derrell
It is used in gmx.com but they are still using 0.7 Best Fabian ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ qooxdoo-devel mailing list qooxdoo-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel
