Hi Derrell,
Derrell Lipman wrote: > > I just added the following to the jsonrpc_extensions wiki pgae: > > qooxdoo JSON dates > > Traditionally, qooxdoo JSON-RPC backends have been required to support a > non-standard feature of JSON, passing Date object instances as > instantiations of a Date object using syntax like new > Date(Date.UTC(2009,11,29,3,10,23,973)) since dates are not a part of the > JSON specification. This proposal moves qooxdoo Dates into the realm of > “extension” rather than required functionality. > > I think this is a good idea, because supporting JSON Dates makes generating the json more complicated and not every application needs this functionality (I don't, for example). So servers might not implement this at all or offer a way of turning JSON dates "on" and "off". Maybe you might want to add a "system.useJsonDates(boolean v)" system method to your proposal? Cheers, Christian -- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/Rpc-backend-harmonization-tp4075821p4092820.html Sent from the qooxdoo mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Join us December 9, 2009 for the Red Hat Virtual Experience, a free event focused on virtualization and cloud computing. Attend in-depth sessions from your desk. Your couch. Anywhere. http://p.sf.net/sfu/redhat-sfdev2dev _______________________________________________ qooxdoo-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel
