Hi Derrell,

thanks for sharing your thoughts on the final ramp down for qooxdoo 1.0.
We both talked about that recently as well, so I know you have some
mixed feelings about getting release 1.0 out the door now.

qooxdoo has gotten a huge amount of testing, bug fixing, polishing and
field testing over the last months (if not the entire year). Besides the
full-time core devs many committers and users have contributed to this
process, and there has been a clear stabilization and convergence. The
framework in all of its main aspects now is sufficiently mature and
well-tested, ready for an 1.0 release, and we're going to ship it as
planned and communicated.

There always is the feeling of yet another round of testing, yet another
round of bug fixes, etc. It basically applies to any release, clearly
for "the" 1.0. That is quite understandable, and we always pay a lot of
attention to this ourselves.

Given the record and quality of qooxdoo development, feedback and
releases you shouldn't really need to worry when it comes to 1.0. It
will be an important milestone, but not the end of development, rather a
strong foundation for the challenges ahead. It will continue, there'll
be maintenance releases, a 1.1, a 1.5, a 2.0 at sometime in the future.
Over the years (almost 5 years now) many users even argued for a much
earlier "1.0" naming, mostly due to qooxdoo's maturity. Maybe we should
be at qooxdoo 4.0 now rather than 1.0? We have always been reluctant,
worked hard and in accordance with the public roadmap and are confident
for the upcoming release.

There have been many opportunities and requests to align with the
framework progress, e.g. releases like 0.8.3 or 1.0-beta1, also
involving users to working against SVN trunk with intense and fast
collaboration via bugzilla and mailing list. During the final phase we
keep updating the following snapshots frequently, inform the mailing
list and ask everyone for their ongoing testing:

* The latest demo apps have been put online for testing (like every
Friday) at http://demo.qooxdoo.org/devel/

* Also, the latest SDK (r21165) is available for your testing at:
http://demo.qooxdoo.org/snapshot/qooxdoo-1.0-sdk-r21165.zip

Please note: The code base has been switch internally to the 1.0 version
name already to allow for an end-to-end SDK testing. This is NOT yet the
final 1.0!

Thanks for your ongoing testing and providing feedback via bugzilla,
this is much appreciated,

Andreas

-- 
Andreas Ecker
Project Lead
http://qooxdoo.org


On Mon, 2009-12-14 at 10:16 -0500, Derrell Lipman wrote:
> I know i'm going to be ignored on this, but I feel sufficiently
> strongly about it that I really think it needs to be said.
> 
> There have been a massive number of changes to trunk since the last
> pre-release. The version 1.0 release is likely (we all hope!) to be
> picked up by the press and tried and tested by many who have not used
> it. Although it's possible that nothing is broken, I think it is
> really, really dangerous to release this code as version 1.0 without
> doing pre-releases which are tested by many people first.
> 
> I propose that Wednesday's planned release date be changed to a
> pre-release. I believe that Europe pretty much shuts down for a number
> of weeks at the end of the year. That would allow a month or so of
> testing and critical-bug fixing (only!), followed by at least one more
> pre-release with those bugs fixed, so that the actual 1.0 release in
> mid-January is much more properly field-tested. I understand the
> desire to meet the originally-publicized schedule, but this is the
> reputation of qooxdoo on the line. A 1.0 release is not the time to
> rush out a release that has had substantial change and not a lot of
> external testing.




------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Return on Information:
Google Enterprise Search pays you back
Get the facts.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/google-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
qooxdoo-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel

Reply via email to