Thank you Thomas,
adding the combined images to the #assets did the trick!
/Peter
On 2010-04-29 11:00 thron7 wrote:
> I found it: The problem is in the way combined images are subjected to
> #asset hints. They have to be included :-\ .
>
> So, for the time being you have to #asset them, either by a wild card
> that includes them (e.g. #asset(infodesk/*)), or explicitly:
>
> #asset(infodesk/flag-combined.png)
> #asset(infodesk/icon/icon16-combined.png)
> #asset(infodesk/icon/icon32-combined.png)
>
> Then it works as expected. I consider this a bug, and have opened a
> report for it (bug#3649).
>
> Sorry for the hassle.
> T.
>
>
> On 04/28/2010 09:39 AM, Peter Schneider wrote:
>>> On 04/27/2010 05:51 PM, Peter Schneider wrote:
>>>> Hi there,
>>>>
>>>> I'm currently trying to combine some images with the help of the generator
>>>> using the documentation on [1] & [2].
>>>> The combining itself seems to work (the combined images and the
>>>> "meta"-files
>>>> get created), but the application doesn't care about this.
>>> You did re-run 'generate.py source/build' after creating the combined
>>> images, did you?!
>> Yes I did.
>> And by the way, my "config.json" is located where the "image.json" is located
>> (see attached zip in my previous post).
>>
>>
>>>> What do I have to do to let the application load the combined image
>>>> instead of
>>>> the "original" files, Or does this only work for "themed" widgets?
>>> Nothing, and no.
>> That was what I'd expected ;)
>>
>>
>>>> For an overview (hopefully ;) ) here's my process/problem:
>>>>
>>>> 1. I'd like to combine groups of my Toolbar Icons into one image.
>>>> (in my case: one for 32x32 sized icons, one for 16x16 sized icons and
>>>> one
>>>> for some flags)
>>>>
>>>> 2. I made a configuration (see attachment "image.json") according to [1]...
>>>>
>>>> 3. I ran "generate -c image.json image-combine" and that did what I
>>>> expected
>>>> (the combined files and the meta-files looking good, from what I can
>>>> say)
>>>> [Side-note: the command line snippets on [1] use "./generator" instead
>>>> of
>>>> "./generate" ...small issue ;) ]
>>> Thanks. Fixed in 1.1 manual.
>> Should also be fixed in 1.0 manual, shouldn't it?
>>
>>
>>>> 4. But the application (neither the 'build' nor the 'source' version) does
>>>> not
>>>> even contain any reference to any of those combined images...
>>> So what is the observed behaviour? Is your app using the individual
>>> images alright? Which browser do you test with?
>> The application ('source'- and 'build'-version) works perfectly with
>> individual
>> images.
>> I do my tests with FF 3.6.3 (+firebug) on Windows XP.
>> The combined images of the framework do work (e.g. "arrows-combined.png" is
>> loaded), so I don't think it's a Browser/OS issue.
>>
>> As I mentioned, the generated application scripts do not contain anything
>> like
>> "infodesk/flag-combined.png"...
>>
>> My guess is, that there's a misconfiguration at the paths
>>
>>
>>>> 5. All images have been noted in the "#asset"s, but they are not directly
>>>> used
>>>> in any image-constructor. So there's no line like this
>>>> <code>
>>>> var foo = new qx.ui.toolbar.Button("foo",
>>>>
>>>> "infodesk/icon/32/preferences.png");
>>>> </code>
>>>> I'm using a 'indirection' like this:
>>>> <code>
>>>> var foo_config = {txt:"foo", ico:"infodesk/icon/32/preferences.png");
>>>> var foo = new qx.ui.toolbar.Button(foo_config.txt, foo_config.ico);
>>>> </code>
>>>> But I don't think _this_ is the problem...
>>> If it works without combined images, it should continue to work with them.
>> That's what I'd expected ;)
>>
>> The application just doesn't contain any reference to my combined images in
>> the
>> qx.$$resources = {...} section, just the individual images are noted there.
>> I would have expected:
>> <code>
>> qx.$$resources =
>> {...,"infodesk/flag_client.png":[21,13,"png","infodesk","infodesk/flag-combined.png",0,-13],...}
>> </code>
>>
>> but the generated script just has this:
>> <code>
>> qx.$$resources =
>> {...,"infodesk/flag_client.png":[21,13,"png","infodesk"],...}
>> </code>
>>
>> So again, I believe I did not get the thing with "prefix" and/or "files"
>> right
>> in my image.json file.
>>
>> Do the "meta" files look O.K. for you? I think they do, but you're the expert
>> on that :D
>>
>>
>>> T.
>> Peter
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
qooxdoo-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel
