Hi Thomas,

thanks for your effort, but the current trunk is not working at all.
Neither does r22147. I think its 'cause of the "re-org name spaces" in
rev 22142-22146...
Therefore I have to merge a little bit more manual...

I think I can manage to fix those issues I have here, but I can not yet confirm
whether your fix does fix the original issue...

"Don't panic!"(TM) ;)

Currently it seems that the import paths seem to be off, but I have not really
looked at it in detail.

Nevertheless, nice weekend to all of you
  Peter


On 2010-05-07 15:21 thron7 wrote:
> I've added another commit (r22147), hopefully this finishes it off. But
> this time multiple files are affected, so make sure you update all of
> them. - Thanks for bringing this up agin.
> 
> T.
> 
> On 05/06/2010 04:36 PM, thron7 wrote:
>> You're right, I'll have a look at it.
>>
>> T.
>>
>> On 05/06/2010 02:42 PM, Peter Schneider wrote:
>>> Hi Thomas,
>>>
>>> sorry, but I can't say that it works...
>>> After this command-sequence:
>>>
>>>   generate distclean
>>>   generate build
>>>
>>> My "combined images" are not copied into the build/resource/... folder.
>>>
>>>
>>> Or do I have to patch any other files than
>>> "trunk/qooxdoo/tool/pylib/generator/action/CodeGenerator.py" ?
>>> I chose r22131 'cause it currently is the most current commit with bug#3649
>>>
>>> /Peter
>>>
>>> On 2010-05-06 14:36 thron7 wrote:
>>>> Checked in a new patch (r22127).
>>>>
>>>> T.
>>>>
>>>> On 05/05/2010 03:23 PM, Peter Schneider wrote:
>>>>> Hi Thomas,
>>>>>
>>>>> sorry to  re-open this again, but I think the 'generate build' job does 
>>>>> not
>>>>> handle the combined images correct.
>>>>> The generated (build-)script tries to load the combined images, but the
>>>>> generator did not copy the resources!
>>>>>
>>>>> So, I still have to keep the "#asset(infodesk/*-combined.png)" line in my
>>>>> modules to be able to create a deployable "build-version".
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>   Peter
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2010-05-05 15:15 Peter Schneider wrote:
>>>>>> I checked your commit (rev22101,22102 from trunk) and can confirm that 
>>>>>> it is no
>>>>>> longer needed to add any extra "#asset(foo/bar/icon-combined.png)" to the
>>>>>> source! So -from my point of view- you can merge it into the 1.1.x 
>>>>>> branch :-D
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>   Peter
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2010-05-03 11:35 thron7 wrote:
>>>>>>> I checked in a commit that is supposed to fix this, so you don't have to
>>>>>>> specify your combined images in #asset hints anymore. - Give it a go:
>>>>>>> rev22102.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> T.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 04/29/2010 11:03 AM, Peter Schneider wrote:
>>>>>>>> Thank you Thomas,
>>>>>>>> adding the combined images to the #assets did the trick!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> /Peter
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 2010-04-29 11:00 thron7 wrote:
>>>>>>>>> I found it: The problem is in the way combined images are subjected to
>>>>>>>>> #asset hints. They have to be included :-\ .
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So, for the time being you have to #asset them, either by a wild card
>>>>>>>>> that includes them (e.g. #asset(infodesk/*)), or explicitly:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> #asset(infodesk/flag-combined.png)
>>>>>>>>> #asset(infodesk/icon/icon16-combined.png)
>>>>>>>>> #asset(infodesk/icon/icon32-combined.png)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Then it works as expected. I consider this a bug, and have opened a
>>>>>>>>> report for it (bug#3649).
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Sorry for the hassle.
>>>>>>>>> T.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 04/28/2010 09:39 AM, Peter Schneider wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 04/27/2010 05:51 PM, Peter Schneider wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi there,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm currently trying to combine some images with the help of the 
>>>>>>>>>>>> generator
>>>>>>>>>>>> using the documentation on [1] & [2].
>>>>>>>>>>>> The combining itself seems to work (the combined images and the 
>>>>>>>>>>>> "meta"-files
>>>>>>>>>>>> get created), but the application doesn't care about this.
>>>>>>>>>>> You did re-run 'generate.py source/build' after creating the 
>>>>>>>>>>> combined
>>>>>>>>>>> images, did you?!
>>>>>>>>>> Yes I did.
>>>>>>>>>> And by the way, my "config.json" is located where the "image.json" 
>>>>>>>>>> is located
>>>>>>>>>> (see attached zip in my previous post).
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> What do I have to do to let the application load the combined 
>>>>>>>>>>>> image instead of
>>>>>>>>>>>> the "original" files, Or does this only work for "themed" widgets?
>>>>>>>>>>> Nothing, and no.
>>>>>>>>>> That was what I'd expected ;)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> For an overview (hopefully ;) ) here's my process/problem:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. I'd like to combine groups of my Toolbar Icons into one image.
>>>>>>>>>>>>    (in my case: one for 32x32 sized icons, one for 16x16 sized 
>>>>>>>>>>>> icons and one
>>>>>>>>>>>>    for some flags)
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. I made a configuration (see attachment "image.json") according 
>>>>>>>>>>>> to [1]...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 3. I ran "generate -c image.json image-combine" and that did what 
>>>>>>>>>>>> I expected
>>>>>>>>>>>>    (the combined files and the meta-files looking good, from what 
>>>>>>>>>>>> I can say)
>>>>>>>>>>>>    [Side-note: the command line snippets on [1] use "./generator" 
>>>>>>>>>>>> instead of
>>>>>>>>>>>>     "./generate" ...small issue ;) ]
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks. Fixed in 1.1 manual.
>>>>>>>>>> Should also be fixed in 1.0 manual, shouldn't it?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 4. But the application (neither the 'build' nor the 'source' 
>>>>>>>>>>>> version) does not
>>>>>>>>>>>>    even contain any reference to any of those combined images...
>>>>>>>>>>> So what is the observed behaviour? Is your app using the individual
>>>>>>>>>>> images alright? Which browser do you test with?
>>>>>>>>>> The application ('source'- and 'build'-version) works perfectly with 
>>>>>>>>>> individual
>>>>>>>>>> images.
>>>>>>>>>> I do my tests with FF 3.6.3 (+firebug) on Windows XP.
>>>>>>>>>> The combined images of the framework do work (e.g. 
>>>>>>>>>> "arrows-combined.png" is
>>>>>>>>>> loaded), so I don't think it's a Browser/OS issue.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> As I mentioned, the generated application scripts do not contain 
>>>>>>>>>> anything like
>>>>>>>>>> "infodesk/flag-combined.png"...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> My guess is, that there's a misconfiguration at the paths
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 5. All images have been noted in the "#asset"s, but they are not 
>>>>>>>>>>>> directly used
>>>>>>>>>>>>    in any image-constructor. So there's no line like this
>>>>>>>>>>>>    <code>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      var foo = new qx.ui.toolbar.Button("foo",
>>>>>>>>>>>>                                         
>>>>>>>>>>>> "infodesk/icon/32/preferences.png");
>>>>>>>>>>>>    </code>
>>>>>>>>>>>>    I'm using a 'indirection' like this:
>>>>>>>>>>>>    <code>
>>>>>>>>>>>>      var foo_config = {txt:"foo", 
>>>>>>>>>>>> ico:"infodesk/icon/32/preferences.png");
>>>>>>>>>>>>      var foo = new qx.ui.toolbar.Button(foo_config.txt, 
>>>>>>>>>>>> foo_config.ico);
>>>>>>>>>>>>    </code>
>>>>>>>>>>>>    But I don't think _this_ is the problem...
>>>>>>>>>>> If it works without combined images, it should continue to work 
>>>>>>>>>>> with them.
>>>>>>>>>> That's what I'd expected ;)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The application just doesn't contain any reference to my combined 
>>>>>>>>>> images in the
>>>>>>>>>> qx.$$resources = {...} section, just the  individual images are 
>>>>>>>>>> noted there.
>>>>>>>>>> I would have expected:
>>>>>>>>>>  <code>
>>>>>>>>>>  qx.$$resources =
>>>>>>>>>> {...,"infodesk/flag_client.png":[21,13,"png","infodesk","infodesk/flag-combined.png",0,-13],...}
>>>>>>>>>>  </code>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> but the generated script just has this:
>>>>>>>>>>  <code>
>>>>>>>>>>  qx.$$resources = 
>>>>>>>>>> {...,"infodesk/flag_client.png":[21,13,"png","infodesk"],...}
>>>>>>>>>>  </code>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> So again, I believe I  did not get the thing with "prefix" and/or 
>>>>>>>>>> "files" right
>>>>>>>>>> in my image.json file.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Do the "meta" files look O.K. for you? I think they do, but you're 
>>>>>>>>>> the expert
>>>>>>>>>> on that :D
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> T.
>>>>>>>>>> Peter

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
qooxdoo-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel

Reply via email to