thron7-2 wrote:
> 
> AFAICT, the Python RPC hasn't been touched for a while. If you look at
> [1], you'll see that the compatible qooxdoo versions are 0.8 and
> 0.9-pre, so chances are the server implementation is not fully
> compatible with the current client classes.
> 
> If you stick with the Python RPC it might be necessary that you apply
> patches to make it conformant with qooxdoo 1.1.x. The RpcExample contrib
> contains the (famous) SERVER_WRITER_GUIDE, which should be of further
> help to tackle the server side of things (I hope this one is up-to-date).
> 

AFAIK, the JSON-RPC Protocol (in its qooxdoo-version) has not changed since
qooxdoo 0.8, so I don't think any changes are necessary on the backend-side
of things, and, if you use the qx.io.remote.Rpc class with its standard API,
I wouldn't know of any changes there either. The python implementation is
simply unmaintained, but when I checked it in as a contrib, everything
worked well. Try the RpcConsole contribution as suggested
(http://qooxdoo.org/documentation/RPC_Python) to test the backend and please
report the errors that are thrown, then we might be able to help.

Cheers, Christian
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://qooxdoo.678.n2.nabble.com/General-question-tp5247622p5254139.html
Sent from the qooxdoo mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint
What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone?
Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first
_______________________________________________
qooxdoo-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/qooxdoo-devel

Reply via email to